AqtaAqta

Accountable AI for consequential decisions.

Who cleared this?

Controls for AI that hold when challenged.

every line here is checkable

What Seal checks

An action nobody cleared can look perfectly reasonable.

Detection asks what looks dangerous. Seal asks what a person cleared.

  • A supplier page says the bank details have changed.
  • A note asks for one payment to be split in two.
  • Yesterday’s approval, presented again.
  • A release that is not the one signed off.

one payment

Cleared: €4,800 to Harbour Print, the account on the invoice.

Proposed: the same €4,800, to the new account on the supplier’s page.

RefusedThe approval named one account, not any account.

and the refusal is signed

Each can arrive with a good explanation. Seal does not judge how a request sounds. Before the action runs, it checks the exact amount, payee or version against what a person cleared, and signs the outcome either way.

Pre-registered evaluation

Can an AI agent act beyond the authority it was given?

Authority Arena tests AI agents under pressure, comparing different controls against unauthorised actions and measuring whether legitimate work still gets done.

Explore the results →

Try it

AI agents can now reason and act. They shouldn't be able to give themselves permission.

Propose an action. Seal checks it against a demo rule set and signs the decision.

A record shows the decision Seal signed for the proposed action, unchanged since. It does not show that the action ran, or that every action went through Seal. Seal enforces at the gateway you route actions through; an action that bypasses the gateway is neither checked nor signed.

an agent proposes

The action
agent  release-agent
tool   git.push_production
args   {"repo":"payments-api","ref":"main"}

the signed record lands here

Checked rather than believed.

Pilot programme for teams deploying AI in consequential workflows. Two weeks, fixed scope: one workflow, one review path, one evidence pack.